← All projects
Featured Portfolio Web Pipeline Cycle 000

LayerLab
Portfolio Site

We used our own 4-stage multi-agent pipeline to scope, design, build, and ship this portfolio. MiroFish validated. GoogleStitch designed. OpenClaw built and deployed. ~2 hours from blank slate to live site.

~2h
Build time
5
Pages shipped
3
Agent stages
$15
API cost
Overview

Building the portfolio with the portfolio's own pipeline

AI Product Studio needed a public portfolio — but more than that, it needed proof that the pipeline actually works. The decision was straightforward: build the portfolio using the same 4-stage multi-agent process used for every client project, and document it as Pipeline Cycle 000.

The result is this site. Every design token, every component, every page was produced by specialized agents operating in sequence through Paperclip. No designer opened Figma. No engineer wrote a line by hand. The pipeline ran on itself and shipped a production-grade site in roughly two hours.

The Problem

No public presence, no proof of capability

Before this site, AI Product Studio had no way to demonstrate its methodology to potential clients. The studio needed a site that communicated the value proposition clearly, showcased the pipeline methodology, and served as a contact point — all while proving the pipeline works by running it on itself.

The constraint was intentional: validate → design → build → deploy, with specialized agents at each stage and no manual intervention between stages. If the pipeline couldn't ship its own portfolio, the client story would be unconvincing.

The Process

Four stages, three heartbeat runs

The pipeline ran in sequential heartbeat runs across a single day (2026-03-19), each agent picking up exactly where the previous one stopped. Handoffs were comment-driven — an @mention in the Paperclip issue thread served as the explicit stage transition signal.

01 · MiroFish
Done
Validate + Outline
Value proposition statement, 4-page sitemap with detail template, full content outline per section, 8/8 validation checklist passed. All deliverables written to the AIP-3 plan document.
02 · GoogleStitch
Done
Design System + Mockups
Complete design system (tokens.css + components.css), 5 full-page HTML mockups, responsive breakpoints, and a complete build handoff spec. Written directly to disk.
03 · OpenClaw
Done
Build
5 pages implemented with zero design deviations. Mobile nav, scroll animations, contact form, project filter bar, sticky sidebar. Git committed to main.
04 · OpenClaw
Done
Deploy
Production deploy to Vercel via npx vercel --prod. Site live at LayerLab domain. Case study updated with real deployment URL.
Retrospective

What worked and what didn't

A post-run review captured four strengths and three gaps in this cycle:

Handoff spec quality. GoogleStitch's detailed handoff spec meant OpenClaw built all 5 pages with zero design questions or revision cycles. Clear specs eliminate rework.
Production-ready CSS from design stage. Importing tokens.css and components.css directly into production HTML eliminated a translation step between design and build.
Single-task scoping. Each stage was one Paperclip issue with explicit deliverables. Agents didn't scope-creep because task boundaries were clear.
Comment-driven handoff. @-mentions in issue comments served as reliable stage transition signals without any out-of-band communication.
Deployment credentials not pre-provisioned. Stage 4 was initially blocked because Vercel tokens weren't available at build time. Credentials should be set up before Stage 3 starts.
No Lighthouse audit gate. Accessibility and SEO spec compliance was assumed but not automatically verified. A post-deploy audit should be a mandatory pipeline step.
Compressed timeline, no review buffer. All stages ran the same day with no window for board review between design and build. Future cycles should include a 24-hour gate between Stage 2 and 3.
The Result

A live portfolio that is the proof

You're reading it. The page you're on was written by an AI agent, pulling from a case study document authored by another AI agent, based on work done by three other AI agents — all coordinated through Paperclip with approximately six board interactions total.

For clients, this is the most direct demonstration available: same pipeline, same agents, same output quality. Pipeline Cycle 000 is now the reference run for every project that follows.

The portfolio site is itself the proof of concept — scoped, designed, and built entirely by the studio's agents without manual board intervention beyond task assignment.
Pipeline Cycle 000 · 2026-03-19
~2h
Build time
5
Pages shipped
$15
API cost

Want the same pipeline
running on your idea?

Bring us a brief. We'll validate, design, build, and ship it — the same way we built this.